Peer review definitely had its positive and negatives.  The negatives about it was that if you weren’t able to comment on your peers work before the other person in the group does that person really has an advantage.  They are able to comment on all the bad things and all you can really do is say I agree with such and such.  That is the one bad thing about it.  So in my peer review I was able to help him a little.   In his paper he wasn’t very supportive of his quotes so I gave him some ideas on how to expand his thoughts.  I think that was the major thing wrong with his paper.  Everything in it was great but he didn’t explain any of the quotes so that was a bummer when I was reading his draft.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ld6S-mtb_KljCmvHu_2g-ZKFZqALQuq_VsTBreIQPhg/edit